Wednesday, June 23, 2004

Too Fahr' To Care

A good explanation about why a lot of us get so worked up about You-Know-Who's recent diatribes (from Christopher Hitchens on Slate):

"So I know, thanks, before you tell me, that a documentary must have a "POV" or point of view and that it must also impose a narrative line. But if you leave out absolutely everything that might give your "narrative" a problem and throw in any old rubbish that might support it, and you don't even care that one bit of that rubbish flatly contradicts the next bit, and you give no chance to those who might differ, then you have betrayed your craft. If you flatter and fawn upon your potential audience, I might add, you are patronizing them and insulting them. By the same token, if I write an article and I quote somebody and for space reasons put in an ellipsis like this (…), I swear on my children that I am not leaving out anything that, if quoted in full, would alter the original meaning or its significance. Those who violate this pact with readers or viewers are to be despised."

3 Comments:

At 12:09 PM, Scot said...

I think it would be great if, like Voldemort in the Harry Potter books, no one ever dared to mention you-know-who by name again.

 
At 12:03 PM, WerdNord said...

Sure, but we can mention Voldemort's name all we want. Heck, I'm voting for him.

 
At 5:02 PM, Anonymous said...

Keep up the good work video editing schools

 

Post a Comment

<< Home